First off, what makes a 'tunnel
motor' a 'tunnel motor'. Or why did these locomotives gain
a special nickname.
These locomotives were designed to operate
efficiently inside tunnels or snowsheds, giving us the first
part 'tunnel'. Motor is a holdover from the early days,
when steam was still king. Electric trams and trolleys were
powered by electric motors, and driven by a Motorman, hence
the vehicles were called 'motors' by the Motormen. Some
engineers carried this over to the then new diesel locomotives,
and were in fact quite correct. The electric traction motors
actually move the diesel locomotive, the diesel engine,
simply drives an electric generator or alternator, to supply
electric current to the traction motors. A diesel locomotive,
should properly be called a diesel-electric locomotive...
Who first coined it, and how this nickname came about is
unknown.
But it sounds and reads a whole lot better than 'tunnel
diesel'...
SP started to have trouble with high horsepower
locomotives. When the SD45's came along, the combination
of long or numerous tunnels, snowsheds and low speeds, found
trailing units in a multiple unit consist, experiencing
high engine temperature shutdowns. As units dropped off-line,
the train speed dropped, which increased time spent inside
the tunnel, causing other units to overheat and also shutdown.
The SD45's, like most other locomotives
of the time, draw their combustion air, and exhaust their
combustion gases at the top of the locomotive. When running
in their usual environment, engine operation is quite normal.
Inside a tunnel, the situation changes, being enclosed the
exhaust gases have nowhere to dissipate quickly. So they
collect near the top of the tunnel roof, the trailing locomotives
radiator fans, then draw these gases in as well as any clean
air, to heat exchange with, or cool the hot engine cooling
water running through the radiator cores. However, as the
cooling air is not cold, none or little heat exchange can
take place, so hot cooling water is returned to the engine,
which only makes it hotter, until it exceeds the temperature
limits. At which point the engine management system will
shut the engine down, to stop any critical damage from occurring.
As units shutdown a number of problems
can occur.
Any shutdown units add their dead-weight to the train, instead
of contributing pulling power, The traction motors in the
running locomotives, having more work to do, can start to
overheat. If they exceed their short-time rating, they can
burnout, unless the engine overheats first... If enough
locomotives shutdown, the train can have less than the required
horsepower to actually move the train, and so stall, possibly
inside the tunnel, The crew can experience breathing difficulties,
due to build up of exhaust fumes. In the days of steam locomotives,
SP had similar problems, this lead to the development of
the Cab-Forward or Cab-Ahead locomotives.
In an effort to overcome these problems
in the diesel era. Experiments were conducted to separate
where the cooling air was drawn from, and the exhaust gases
were expelled. The 'Elephant Eared' SD45's were the outcome.
The metal shrouds fitted over the radiators, caused the
cooling air to be drawn over the walkway, which meant inside
a tunnel or snowshed, the air at the bottom of the tunnel
was hopefully cooler than the air/exhaust gas at the top.
Having successfully proved the theory, EMD developed the
'tunnel motor' radiator. This was first applied to the 1972
delivered SD45T-2's.
The 'tunnel motor' nickname, is actually applied to several
slightly different EMD locomotives.
The model designations of, SD45T-2, SD40T-2 and SP's rebuilt
SD45T-2R, have been proved official by Don Strack, and this
is what he has discovered:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Once again, we return to the question of when and if SD45T-2
was an 'official' EMD designation.
The recent discovery of records from EMD's
Quality Assurance Department shows that the very first frame
from the first Tunnel Motors, EMD order 7336, for SP 9166-9208,
was laid down on December 13, 1971. A notation in the QA
record for that frame clearly shows the model as SD45T-2.
The first unit was delivered to SP in February 1972.
So, yes, SD45T-2, and the whole T-2 nomenclature, was pure
EMD right from the start; railfans and the railfan press
were not involved.
With the understanding that each department
at EMD (Engineering, Sales, and Service) was truly different
in their methods, the T-2 designation was definitely part
of EMD's engineering reference, with sales (locomotive specification
books) and service (product reference books) coming to the
game a couple years after the fact. An example of the Service
Department delay is that the service manual for the SD40T-2
is labeled as 'SD40-2, with cooling system modification.'
Remembering that EMD means "Every Model Different",
my question was if the T-2 designation was from EMD, or
was it from the railfans. I have my answer -- it was from
EMD.
© Don Strack